Britney Spears’ Supporters Speculate Kevin Federline’s Hawaii Move Linked to Extended Child Support Laws
As news of Kevin Federline’s intention to move their two sons, Sean Preston and Jayden James, to Hawaii surfaces, fans of Britney Spears suspect that the motive behind the relocation is to take advantage of the state’s extended child support laws. The speculation stems from Hawaii’s provision that mandates child support payments until the age of 23 for children enrolled full-time in accredited educational institutions.
Hawaii’s Extended Child Support Laws Prompt Fan
Theories Britney Spears’ supporters on social media are suggesting that Kevin Federline’s desire to move their sons to Hawaii is driven by the state’s extended child support laws. Hawaii’s legislation dictates that child support continues until the age of 23 if the child attends an accredited college or vocational school full-time. Fans speculate that Federline may be seeking to benefit from these laws, leading to ongoing financial obligations for Spears.
Timing Raises Suspicions among Observers
The timing of the intended relocation has raised eyebrows among fans, particularly due to a lawsuit filed against Federline by a Christian college-preparatory school in California, alleging unpaid tuition fees of over $15,000 for his other children.
Observers point out that Federline’s decision to move to Hawaii, where he could potentially apply for child support until the boys reach the age of 23, seems closely aligned with the financial challenges he currently faces. This has sparked skepticism and suspicion regarding his motivations.
Spears and Federline’s History of Child Support
Negotiations Britney Spears and Kevin Federline have a history of child support negotiations. Previously, Spears paid Federline $20,000 per month in child support. In May 2018, Federline sought an increase, leading to an agreement reached in August of that year. However, the specific terms of their agreement remain undisclosed.
Federline’s Alleged Exploitation of Spears’ Finances
Some fans and critics argue that Federline’s actions amount to exploiting Spears for financial gain. The belief is that he continues to rely on her financial resources, and the move to Hawaii is perceived as another attempt to secure ongoing child support payments.
Legal Consent and Family Dynamics
Despite fan theories and suspicions, Spears’ attorney, Mathew Rosengart, revealed that the pop star does not object to Federline moving to Hawaii with their sons and consents to the relocation. Federline’s wife, Victoria Prince, reportedly secured a job in Hawaii starting in August, which prompted the family’s decision to move. .
The planned move of Britney Spears’ sons to Hawaii by Kevin Federline has generated speculation and theories among fans regarding his motives. With the state’s extended child support laws in focus, fans raise concerns about ongoing financial obligations and potential exploitation of Spears’ wealth.
While the timing and circumstances surrounding the relocation fuel suspicion, Spears’ consent to the move and her attorney’s statements indicate a level of cooperation. As the situation unfolds, attention remains on the complex dynamics between Spears, Federline, and the ongoing financial implications tied to their relationship.
