Former President Donald Trump is seeking a new trial or reduced damages in the civil case brought against him by writer E. Jean Carroll. A jury previously found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages. However, Trump’s attorneys argue that the verdict is excessive and are pushing for a reconsideration of the decision. The case has garnered significant attention, highlighting the ongoing legal battle between Carroll and Trump.
Carroll’s Accusations and Donald Trump’s Denials Against Sexual Abuse Case :
E. Jean Carroll accused Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her in a department store changing room during the mid-1990s. Trump vehemently denies the allegations, claiming that Carroll fabricated the story. The conflicting testimonies formed the basis of the trial and sparked a heated debate surrounding the credibility of both parties.
The Argument for Reduced Damages:
Trump’s attorneys contend that a portion of the awarded damages, specifically $2 million, is excessive because the jury did not find Trump liable for rape. They assert that the compensation should be proportionate to the charges proven against him.
It emphasizes that the jury’s decision was not unanimous on all counts. The filing further argues that the remaining damages related to defamation were awarded without proper due process.
The Response from Carroll’s Legal Team:
Roberta Kaplan, Carroll’s attorney, has strongly criticized Trump’s attempt to diminish or invalidate the damages awarded to her client. She dismisses Trump’s arguments as frivolous, highlighting that the jury carefully considered the evidence presented by Carroll.
Trump did not present any witnesses of his own during the trial. Kaplan asserts that Trump cannot escape the consequences of his actions, regardless of his attempts to downplay the verdict.
Connecting Allegations to Trump’s Modus Operandi:
During the trial, Carroll’s legal team argued that her allegations against Trump align with a pattern of behavior they refer to as his “modus operandi.” Witnesses testified that Carroll had confided in them about the incident.
While two other women described similar encounters with Trump that escalated into sexual misconduct. The infamous “Access Hollywood” video, in which Trump made crude remarks about grabbing women by their genitals, was also presented as evidence.
Trump’s Appeal and Carroll’s Additional Lawsuit:
Not content with the outcome of the trial, Trump has appealed the verdict and continues to vehemently deny the allegations made by Carroll. In a separate development, Carroll amended a previously filed defamation lawsuit against Trump, seeking an additional $10 million in damages.
She argues that Trump’s disparaging comments made at a televised town hall after the jury found him liable warrant further compensation for the harm caused.
The legal battle between E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump continues as the former president seeks a new trial or reduced damages in the civil case. The outcome of this high-profile case will have implications for both parties involved.
It sheds light on the issues of sexual abuse, defamation, and the accountability of public figures. As the proceedings unfold, the public awaits further developments that will shape the trajectory of this contentious legal dispute.